Life. Inspiration. Perseverance. Comedy. Love

Agreement Alignment Difference

In Uncategorized on 02/12/2020 at 02:17

However, alignment begins with forms of agreement. We agree to move towards a goal or a vision. We all agree that, to be consistent, we will draw inspiration from our ideas and other people`s ideas. We agree that in order to stay in harmony, we must work on it and that we must feel comfortable with the uncomfortable. And the consequence of this way of dealing with disagreements is that we waste time and energy that spin our wheels. Nor does a successful orientation mean that you necessarily love each other or agree. You can, for example. B, agree with a colleague on the need to do work together, when you don`t like each other or disagree on methods. Build: How many times do the best teams have enough collective confidence to be in a potential focus on almost every topic – and rarely feel the level of personal or organizational risk that justifies the search for an agreement instead of harmonization? We don`t need to be consistent with each other`s ideas or methods to be consistent with one goal. Guidance replaces the need to agree. In fact, the best form of guidance usually comes from a number of differences and differences. The friction that is often caused when you disagree and discuss a topic is the kind of thing that allows you to see all the sides of a situation or at least more than your page.

Build: In your article, you enter an acquisition -; something that puts on the table a huge potential risk – like a scenario in which a high-level team may need an agreement instead of a direction. In your experience, what other events usually require the search for unity? If a team member is not lined up, it means that they are heading towards a different goal than the rest of the team. That`s why the story I shared at the beginning cuts to the marrow. It was an example of a teammate who shared a disagreement over historical facts that he considered relevant to the team`s future actions as a misdirection. It`s like getting thrown out of the car because you want to cross the river of trucks through the forest. A department head considers respectful disagreements like this, because without them, the team will leave the street if no one has the courage to speak out. You can see this principle in the workplace in marriage, for example, where two people agree to be in harmony with the goal (that`s why we make vows), but most of us know that agreement is not always the byproduct of orientation in a relationship. For parents, this is a usual situation. I know that my wife and I are very committed to what we want for our children; Let them become responsible and trustworthy adults. But in this way, we often disagree on different decisions.

We should use this orientation to explain our choice: one of us would explain how to let a teenager go somewhere to achieve our “responsible” goal, and the other would explain that this teenager would not lead to our “adult life”. It was a constant confirmation of our orientation, but in the end, as a team, we had to agree on what we would say to the teenager, while realizing the creative tension that is part of the dynamics of parenting. “The main force that influences the threshold between direction and agreement is trust within the team,” he writes.